this amendment proposes to offer a 50- percent tax credit for employers of reservists to encourage differential pay. This amendment does not benefit those who are self-employed and provides little benefit to small businesses with little equity. In addition, nearly 80 percent of the cost of the military tax bill, which we have already passed in the Senate, is dedicated to reservists with the above-the-line deduction that was included because Senator DeWine pushed very hard for it. The amendment is paid for by reducing the dividend exclusion which is essential to our growth package; in other words, to keep a well balanced growth package. So the amendment I see as an attack on the jobs and growth bill, and I ask that it not be adopted.
Chuck Grassley: “this amendment proposes to offer a 50- percent tax credit for employers of reservists to encourage differential pay.…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to tax credits for employers of reservists during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Chuck Grassley
We can’t have a partisan deal on the floor of the United States Senate, or we don’t get anything done for the family farmers.
At my 99 county meetings I hold every year, I hear from farmers facing high input costs and commodity prices below the cost of production that a robust biofuels market enhanced by E15 would answer the prayers of farmers working their tails…
There’s a dangerous assumption that the program will function seamlessly if this statute expires on Friday.
Expanding E15 availability lowers gas prices by 20 to 40 cents per gallon on average. That could mean around $400 per year in savings for a U.S. household—precious dollars that could be spent on other needs.





