On the recordFebruary 2, 2006
All I can say in my 30 seconds on my point is that the Senator may be entirely correct, but that is one of the things that happens when we have 2 days of debate and these amendments are not put before the Senate to study until the last minute. The second concern I have about the proposal is the inclusion of offsets which we have not had an opportunity to fully consider or with respect to which we have some policy concerns. An example of that is the revival of the environmental excise tax offered, referred to as the ``Superfund tax.'' As you might expect, I believe the bill passed by a bipartisan majority with 64 votes in the Senate in November, which we are not going through again, represents a more balanced bill, one that provides longer-term benefits, including increased certainty and reduced complexity for planning. In addition, I raise a point of order that the budget does not meet reconciliation instructions to the Senate. It is an issue of germaneness, Mr. President. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from North Dakota.
Source
govinfo.gov




