I agree that the drafting is not as clear as it might have been. However, it is very clear from all the legislative history that, by adding the new subparagraph, we intended to add a new class of property, business aircraft, to those assets which qualify for the additional year to be placed in service. We did not intend that aircraft which qualify under subparagraph (C) must also qualify under subparagraph (B).
Discussing legislative intent regarding the classification of business aircraft in tax law.
Share
More from Chuck Grassley
The fact is, some of them on both the right and the left, are poorly ideologically organized for their own point of view, and that’s what makes things bad.
Jack Smith should apologize for taking the bank records of 42 Iowans & 4,782 Americans.
I again call on my Democratic colleagues to join my oversight work instead of trying to defend Smith and sweep his abuse of authority under the rug.
I don’t know to what extent you folks are on social media, but I know social media has a big impact on the election.
Other voices in this conversation
