I give the Senator from New York and all the other people on the other side of the aisle the benefit of the doubt, but as a matter of constitutional fact, there is always some theater when the Vice President has to cast a tie-breaking vote. Also, there is some justification for what I said, not based upon what I know is going to happen this time but what I have seen happen in the past. The other thing I want to tell the Senator from New York, regardless of what I said about the theater, I want to base my remarks upon what I think is unneeded legislation. This gets to some of the finer points of law that I am not going to argue and debate with the Senator from New York because he would say under certain circumstances, because of intent or because of court orders, the necessity to go back to State courts, his amendment will enhance the protection of people about whom he is concerned. Those are not serious considerations. His amendment is not needed.
Chuck Grassley: “I give the Senator from New York and all the other people on the other side of the aisle the benefit of the doubt, but…”
On the recordFebruary 2, 2000
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Debating the necessity of an amendment related to bankruptcy legislation.
Share
More from Chuck Grassley
Jul 21, 2026
These families ride an emotional roller coaster every day while they navigate the complex medical care their child needs to survive.
Aug 7, 2026
Our nation’s bankruptcy code should work for Americans, not against them. By eliminating barriers to reorganization and restoring modern debt limits, the bipartisan Bankruptcy Threshold Adjustment Act would provide American families and…
Aug 20, 2026
U.S debt hit $40T. It’s a wake up call [for] America Voters [to have] 40 trillion reasons [to] reject unaffordable socialist policies. American prosperity REQUIRES fiscal discipline.





