We need the answers to these questions, and the answers are not easy to get. We got some answers in June, but not the answers that we expected, Mr. President. The General Accounting Office reports the caps are having ``no significant effect on limiting executive compensation.'' The General Accounting Office did take a close look at one company, McDonnell Douglas. The top executives at McDonnell Douglas got $33 million over and above the $250,000 cap that is in law. That is, of course, all from the U.S. Treasury and all for 1 year. Only $313,000 of the McDonnell Douglas executive pay--that is less than 1 percent--was blocked or affected by the cap.
Chuck Grassley: “We need the answers to these questions, and the answers are not easy to get. We got some answers in June, but not the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of legislative compensation caps on executive pay during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Chuck Grassley
Contrary to your misguided statement, the major embarrassment of the hearing was Democrats falling over themselves defending unlawful and unconstitutional actions by Jack Smith.
The fact is, some of them on both the right and the left, are poorly ideologically organized for their own point of view, and that’s what makes things bad.
For the simple reason that the alternative, of a Democrat from Iowa in the United States Senate, is for Chuck Schumer to lead the United States Senate, and you know how disastrous that would be.
Jack Smith should apologize for taking the bank records of 42 Iowans & 4,782 Americans.





