Mr. President, the Senator from Oregon should have read the 2017 tax bill, and he wouldn't give a speech like that. The Wyden amendment is an example of Democrats on the one hand complaining the wealthy pay too little tax while supporting massive tax cuts for the rich. Nothing in my amendment prevents changes to the Tax Code that would make it more progressive. Capping the SALT deduction as part of the 2017 tax bill increases the progressivity of the Tax Code and allowed for larger tax cuts to the middle class. Undoing the SALT cap would make the Tax Code less progressive and jeopardize middle-class tax cuts that it helped enable. Anyone who supports the wealthy paying their fair share should have supported my amendment and vote no on the Wyden amendment. Vote on Amendment No. 3569 The PRESIDING OFFICER. The question is on agreeing to the amendment.
Share & report
More from Chuck Grassley
Mr. President, I want to report to my colleagues what I am doing today: delivering some history to the Library of Congress. I will tell you about that project in the Library of Congress. This is something that I have done around Veterans…
Mr. President, two points--a short one and a long one. The short one is simply this: to remind my colleagues that at the beginning of the year, we get a Senate calendar that says what days we are going to be in session and what days we are…
Mr. President, over the last 2 weeks, during the Senate recess, I continued my annual 99 county meetings across Iowa. My travels brought me to the Western Iowa community of Jefferson, in Greene County, for a Q&A. I often say Iowans don't…
Mr. President, this month of April is National Donate Life Month. This month is the time to raise awareness about the lifesaving importance of organ donation. There are over 103,000 Americans on the national organ transplant waiting list…





