It's intellectually dishonest since the Republican Party line all along has been to let the people decide in the upcoming election.
Editor's note · Context
Grassley argues against considering Garland's nomination during the lame duck session, citing the party's stance on allowing voters to decide.
Share & report
More from Chuck Grassley
Mr. President, today is a good day for the Senate and a good day for the American people. The Senate will soon pass a bill that is entitled ``HALT Fentanyl Act.'' The House is expected to take the measure up very soon and send it to…
Mr. President, this month of April is National Donate Life Month. This month is the time to raise awareness about the lifesaving importance of organ donation. There are over 103,000 Americans on the national organ transplant waiting list…
I know of no further debate on the nomination. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there further debate?
Mr. President, on Maundy Thursday, the Lord called home one of Iowa's best and brightest civic leaders and a beloved husband and father. A native son of northwest Iowa, Jay Byers passed away at age 54. Maundy is derived from the Latin term…





