Ed Case: “First of all, I think we are trying to confirm whether or not Floyd Bennett Field is, in fact, a military installation…”

“First of all, I think we are trying to confirm whether or not Floyd Bennett Field is, in fact, a military installation within the definition of the gentleman's amendment. That point aside, again, I would say that if we are trying to solve the particular issue that my colleague and friend from New York is trying to solve, let's try to solve that one. Let's not do so with a blunt instrument that takes away discretion across the board for legitimate uses of military installations under congressional oversight, such as the Afghan refugee situation. We can talk about this on the floor. Yes, it is completely necessary to discuss and debate this, but let's not overplay this so that the DOD never has the flexibility to have any military installation used for legitimate purposes that we would all agree with. Mr. Chair, I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from New York (Mr. D'Esposito). The amendment was agreed to. Amendment No. 168 Offered by Mr. Norman The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 168 printed in part A of House Report 118-216.”