I think we all agree on that, but if the U.S. isn't providing concrete alternatives... they're going to adopt those standards and they're not going to inure to our benefit.
I don't think there's any First Amendment protection for impersonating Americans or for bot nets or for automated trolli...
We are here today to talk about governing an Internet that is truly international.
I think that's consistent with what we do offline and there's no reason not to do that.
it seems to me that we're playing chicken with China, and the fundamental disadvantages that we have are numerous
It seems to me that anything that is large enough, even if there is no real direct nexus to national security issues...
I do want to understand whether there's anything for the legislative branch to do, other than stay out of the way.
unlicensed spectrum is another critical input for access to the Internet.
keeping government out of the way
Thank you, OK.
we're advocating for additional spectrum right adjacent to the upper band of 5 gigahertz.