I would respond to the distinguished Senator from Missouri that without question, it is necessary, from a legal standpoint and from a practical standpoint, to get testimony and advice from the legal experts and our operators in the intelligence community to make sure there are no unintended consequences that come out of the final product from the Intelligence Committee. As the Senator will recall, we had some very heated debates on a couple of amendments within the committee. Very good debate on both sides of the issues. Sometimes, there were Democrats arguing with Democrats, other times Republicans were arguing with Republicans, but that is the nature of the Intelligence Committee. It operates in a bipartisan fashion to make sure we look at every aspect--legal, technical, as well as practical--to make sure we get it right. As the vice chairman knows and has been working to correct, some of the amendments adopted in committee were well intentioned but harmful to our collectors. With the input of the intelligence community the manager's amendment has been able to correct those unintended consequences while preserving the intent of the amendments. In this instance, I think we did get it right through engaging with our intelligence experts.
Saxby Chambliss: “I would respond to the distinguished Senator from Missouri that without question, it is necessary, from a legal…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of bipartisan collaboration in the Intelligence Committee's work.
Share
More from Saxby Chambliss
I ask for the yeas and nays. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there a sufficient second? There appears to be a sufficient second. The clerk will call the roll.
I rise today, along with my colleague from New Hampshire, to discuss an issue that has been spoken about on this floor over the last several years many times, but it continues to be a problem. The Senator from New Hampshire has been very…
how much time is remaining? The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator has 5\1/2\ minutes remaining.
I join with my colleague Senator Isakson in recommending that all of our colleagues vote for all three of these judges: Judge Eleanor Ross, Judge Mark Cohen, and Judge Leslie Abrams-- or future judges in all three cases. They are excellent…





