I noticed my friend, the Senator from New York, for whom I have great respect, made a comparison between a hold and a filibuster but yet at the same time he has shown this chart over and over again, showing where we have 168 approved and only 4 filibustered. But as the Senator well knows, the Senators from Michigan have had holds on numbers and numbers of judges for months and months. So his number four, instead of being four, should be about eight, if he really believes a hold was equivalent to a filibuster. So his argument simply doesn't hold water, if I may pose that in the form of a question to the Senator.
Saxby Chambliss: “I noticed my friend, the Senator from New York, for whom I have great respect, made a comparison between a hold and a…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the difference between holds and filibusters in the context of judicial nominations.
Share
More from Saxby Chambliss
I ask unanimous consent that the time the Senator from California used be added to my time. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection?
I join with my colleague Senator Isakson in recommending that all of our colleagues vote for all three of these judges: Judge Eleanor Ross, Judge Mark Cohen, and Judge Leslie Abrams-- or future judges in all three cases. They are excellent…
I rise to pay tribute to the Director of the National Counterterrorism Center Matt Olsen. Matt has announced his intention to leave his position later this year after serving as Director of NCTC for over 3 years. Matt is one of the best…
I rise today, along with my colleague from New Hampshire, to discuss an issue that has been spoken about on this floor over the last several years many times, but it continues to be a problem. The Senator from New Hampshire has been very…





