I will be happy to go back to my friend from New Jersey's recommendation that we go to $1,000 or $5,000 a ton limit. But the gentleman is correct in saying that his amendment does fix the price. If I am wrong about that, please correct me. That flies in the face of everything we have tried to do from a reform of agriculture programs and in particular the peanut program, which is now market oriented. The growers of peanuts took a significant reduction of $678 a ton to $610 a ton in anticipation of selling their peanuts more in the world market. That is the whole idea behind it. What this amendment does is to come in and slap those folks in the face and say, irrespective of how much it costs you to grow it, how much it increases the cost of growing your peanuts next year, throw those facts out the door. The maximum you can get for a ton of peanuts is $640. That is wrong. It is un-American. It is price fixing. I urge my colleagues to vote against this amendment.
Saxby Chambliss: “I will be happy to go back to my friend from New Jersey's recommendation that we go to $1,000 or $5,000 a ton limit. But…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to price limits on peanut production during a floor debate.
Share
More from Saxby Chambliss
I rise with my colleague Senator Isakson today in support of Judge Julie Carnes, who has been nominated by the President to serve as a circuit court judge for the 11th Judicial Circuit. Judge Carnes has been a Federal district court judge…
I rise to talk about the deteriorating situation in Syria and in Iraq. However, before I address the situation in the Middle East, I wish to speak briefly about Russia and the downing of the Malaysian Airline flight 17. Last week we all…
I join with my colleague Senator Isakson in recommending that all of our colleagues vote for all three of these judges: Judge Eleanor Ross, Judge Mark Cohen, and Judge Leslie Abrams-- or future judges in all three cases. They are excellent…





