with a growing threat of strategic nuclear advancement in countries such as Iran, and with SSBNs accounting for the most survivable leg of the triad, does this reduction in SLBMs make sense and how will it affect our ability to provide strategic deterrence for the United States and our allies?
Chambliss questions the impact of reduced SLBMs on U.S. strategic deterrence amid threats from Iran.
Share
More from Saxby Chambliss
as my service in the Senate comes to an end, I rise today to say thank you to some of the wonderful people who have been part of a great ride for over 20 years. We as Americans are fortunate to live in the greatest country in the world; a…
I ask unanimous consent that the time the Senator from California used be added to my time. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection?
I rise today to join my colleagues in discussing the current direction of U.S. foreign policy, especially as it relates to the Middle East. The Obama administration's foreign policy in this regard has unfortunately totally unraveled. The…
I ask for the yeas and nays. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there a sufficient second? There appears to be a sufficient second. The clerk will call the roll.
Other voices in this conversation
