I am still concerned about a national standard.

It is my understanding that the FCC did have a rule in place that had some regulation on that.

I think that the record reflects that capital expenditures have decreased since the FCC's 2017 net neutrality rules went in place at the major providers.

I just believe very strongly that rural America needs to be protected.

There is no reason why a child or a family in rural America should not have the resources and access to all of the necessary resources to realize their full potential.

Just look at the USDA Reconnect Program. It was initially funded in the 2018 omnibus at $600 million...

If you want to recruit and retain top talent, we have to provide employees, at the minimum, with a pay increase to keep up with the cost of living.

A key part of the FCC's analysis with regard to net neutrality was the claim that net neutrality harms investment, yet the evidence supporting that is not clear.

But it appears to me that the recommendations of the inspector general don't carry very much weight with you as administrator and the folks at GSA.

It seems to be very disingenuous.

It appears to me from where I sit and from talking with Federal employees that the Office of Management and Budget is doing everything that it can to cleverly conceal an effort to reduce the Federal workforce, therefore having fewer people…

Well, there are just too many rural communities that do not have access, and the programs that are designed to give access are being cut...