It seems to me that ERS is not being given the resources or not having the resources requested by the administration to maintain the high quality of research that we have enjoyed in the past with that dramatic cut.

On the issue of realignment in your testimony you mention the scientific integrity as set forth in the Code of Federal Regulations.

The amount of funding tied to NAP has proven to be insufficient, especially in the aftermath of both hurricanes.

The hurricanes in 2017 revealed the many challenges tied to NAP, starting with the remarkable difference in the benefits our people receive.

I would think that to move the agency under the Chief Economist would make it have less integrity and less independence.

I would also like to commend the Secretary for his commitment to ensure that no ERS or NIFA employee will be involuntarily separated during that transition.

I continue to be concerned about how smaller companies that make these products are going to be able to afford the cost of the required applications.

Agriculture is a leader when it comes to sustainability and conservation, and it deserves public recognition.

How, in any way, does it make budget sense to move ERS and NIFA outside of DC when there is rent-free space here available?

I appreciate very much the relationship that we enjoy with you and your members.

I want to applaud and let me you know that I think we all support your efforts to keep e-cigarettes and all tobacco products out of the hands of youth.

I want to thank you for your work.