Sanford Bishop said "I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes legislation in an appropriation bill and, therefore, violates clause 2 of rule XXI. The rule states in pertinent part: ``An amendment to a general appropriation bill shall not be in order if changing existing law.'' The amendment requires a new determination. I ask for a ruling from the Chair. The CHAIR. Does any other Member wish to speak to the point of order? {time} 0050" @ PoliticalQuotes.com

On the recordMay 18, 2016

I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes legislation in an appropriation bill and, therefore, violates clause 2 of rule XXI. The rule states in pertinent part: ``An amendment to a general appropriation bill shall not be in order if changing existing law.'' The amendment requires a new determination. I ask for a ruling from the Chair. The CHAIR. Does any other Member wish to speak to the point of order? {time} 0050

Said by

Sanford Bishop

Democratic · Georgia

Source

govinfo.gov

Share on X Share on Facebook Email this quote