I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes legislation in an appropriation bill and, therefore, violates clause 2 of rule XXI. The rule states in pertinent part: ``An amendment to a general appropriation bill shall not be in order if changing existing law.'' The amendment requires a new determination. I ask for a ruling from the Chair. The CHAIR. Does any other Member wish to speak to the point of order? {time} 0050
Sanford Bishop: “I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes legislation in…”
Share
More from Sanford Bishop
I thank Representative Carter for his remarks. I yield to the gentleman from Georgia (Mr. Johnson) of the Fourth Congressional District.
I thank the gentlewoman for yielding. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honor the life of a remarkable man, my colleague and dear friend, Donald Payne, Jr. Donald was a kindhearted public servant who dutifully served New Jersey's 10th…
I am very, very proud to support the Beagle Brigade Act of 2023, and to have had the opportunity to work with my colleagues, Representatives Drew Ferguson, Dan Kildee, and Adrian Smith, and to have the support of our Senators, Senator…
rural Georgians and rural Americans are older, sicker, and less likely to have health insurance than those in our cities. In fact, compared to urban areas, rural Georgians are nearly five times more likely to die early from cancer…





