Mr. Chair, this amendment would prevent the closing of offices of the Farm Service Agency for any reason. Although it mentions COVID-19, the prohibition amendment would not be limited to closures related to COVID. The Crawford amendment is duplicative of the stronger, clearer proviso on page 25, lines 8 through 10 of the bill that is being considered where it says: Provided further that none of the funds available to the farm service agencies shall be used to close Farm Service Agency county offices. Therefore, this amendment is unnecessary because it would create a restriction that the legislation already contains. {time} 0100 We don't know what the future of COVID or any future pandemic or disaster may hold, so we shouldn't impose such a broad restriction. This is duplicative. Madam Chair, I urge my colleagues to oppose the amendment, and I reserve the balance of my time.
Share & report
More from Sanford Bishop
Mr. Chair, this amendment would cut funding for the Office of Civil Rights at USDA by an additional 19 percent. The bill already guts funding for USDA. Any further cuts would just make a bad bill worse. The Office of Civil Rights at USDA…
Mr. Chairman, I yield 5 minutes to the gentlewoman from Connecticut (Ms. DeLauro), the ranking member of the Appropriations Committee. Ms. DeLAURO. Mr. Chairman, the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related…
Mr. Chairman, I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Oklahoma will be postponed. The Acting CHAIR. The Chair understands that…
Mr. Chair, I have extremely strong opposition to this amendment. If there are not sufficient jobs for people in the State, who are we to take that State's judgment away? The other side is always talking about States' rights. Well, these…





