I thank the gentleman for his question. Absolutely not. What the amendment does is it has language, Madam Chair, that inserts the words ``or contact with'' to make that point that firefighters are not using the foam; they are responding after the foam has already been used. As Mr. Shimkus knows, when they come in contact with the foam in the course of their duties, it is our intent to lower the probability of any release of toxic foam on airfields. As I said, most of these releases are accidental releases. By bringing the building code inspectors to the table, we believe that we can reduce all instances of release without opening the dialogue on the topics about which he inquired.
Rob Woodall: “I thank the gentleman for his question. Absolutely not. What the amendment does is it has language, Madam Chair, that…”
Share
More from Rob Woodall
I think my friend from New York is right that in the time of a healthcare pandemic that having a closed rule could have been a possibility. In fact, I have no doubt that the only reason we have any amendments at all available on the floor…
I would inquire how much time remains. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from Georgia has 8 minutes remaining.
I believe that we are both, irrespective of who leads the Congress, irrespective of who leads the White House, we are all disadvantaged as Americans when Congress becomes feckless in its attempts to do oversight over the executive branch.
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to section 3 of House Resolution 965, the yeas and nays are ordered. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 230, nays 180, not voting 20, as…





