It seems to me that this Republican tax bill ought to be judged by two standards. One is fairness and the other is fiscal responsibility. We have talked a fair bit about fairness. This bill provides 41 percent of its benefits to the top 1 percent of the taxpayers, those whose household incomes are over $240,000 a year. In contrast, 20 percent of those in lower tax brackets would not receive any benefit. It is simply not fair. Also, in terms of fiscal responsibility, we look out at the second 10 years, and we are going to be giving up $500 to $600 million in tax revenues that is not going to help a balanced budget. We need a balanced budget that we can get to and stay with, and these tax cuts explode in the outyears, they are not fiscally responsible, and they ought to be rejected for that reason as well.
Rick Allen: “It seems to me that this Republican tax bill ought to be judged by two standards. One is fairness and the other is…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the fairness and fiscal responsibility of a Republican tax bill.
Share
More from Rick Allen
I thank my good friend from Florida, Mr. Bilirakis, for yielding. As vice chairman of the Communications and Technology Subcommittee, I rise today in support of the bipartisan FUTURE Networks Act, which I proudly introduced with my…
We want you to put in the report language a review of the administration's implementation of the American Indian Religious Freedom Act.
I thank the gentlewoman from North Carolina for yielding the time. I rise in support of my bill, H.R. 5339, the Protecting Americans' Investments from Woke Policies Act. The Committee on Education and the Workforce worked diligently this…
I thank Mrs. Miller for her outward expression of faith and for being such a light here in this body to all of us, for her leadership and also putting together this Special Order tonight recognizing Faith Month. Today, we are not only…





