America needs an energy policy that increases our national security, encourages new technologies, enhances economic growth, preserves the environment, and protects consumers. Our nation now spends nearly $200,000 per minute overseas to buy oil, mostly from undemocratic regimes. But this bill does not redirect American energy policy. H.R. 6 only reinforces the failed energy policies of the past, policies which have increased our dependence on fossil fuels. Unfortunately, this bill never escaped the circumstances of its conception in the secret, closed door meetings between Vice President Cheney and the CEOs of the energy industry. Instead of seeking a balanced, bipartisan energy policy, this legislation discards key compromises forged with the widespread support of Republicans and democrats in the 107th Congress. It puts the interests of big energy ahead of consumers and the environment. The bill before us rewards private industry at the expense of the public interest and national security. It provides a $200 million subsidy to the hydro industry; a $397 million subsidy for nuclear fuel reprocessing, a process banned since the Ford Administration; a $1.7 billion hydrogen subsidy to the auto industry; and a $1.8 billion subsidy for clean coal technology. The legislation opens a pristine wilderness, the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, to oil drilling. The bill opens the possibility of oil drilling in offshore areas of the Gulf of Maine.
Rick Allen: “America needs an energy policy that increases our national security, encourages new technologies, enhances economic…”
Editor's note · Context
Criticizing H.R. 6 and its impact on energy policy and national security.
Share
More from Rick Allen
I thank Mrs. Miller for her outward expression of faith and for being such a light here in this body to all of us, for her leadership and also putting together this Special Order tonight recognizing Faith Month. Today, we are not only…
I hate to cut you off, but my time has expired, and you know, I am telling you there is a lot of confusion out there, and if you know, it is been created by your decisions, and it needs to be fixed, and I yield back.
This shortsighted amendment would critically threaten this urgent national security mission by prohibiting funding for the Savannah River Plutonium Modernization Program, which funds facility construction, workforce development, process…
Had I been present, I would have voted YEA on Roll Call No. 56 and AYE on Roll Call No. 57. PERSONAL EXPLANATION





