I met with a number of people in the State of Maine, which I represent, the other day. They were concerned about all of the added costs that the State and the municipality were incurring as a result of their efforts to respond to terrorism. State revenues are declining because of the reduced economy and State expenses are going up. But this bill from the Committee on Ways and Means will further reduce State revenues by $5 billion in each of the next 3 years because the tax systems of so many States are tied to changes in the Federal Tax Code, a reduction in State revenues of $5 billion. How will Members from New York and California, which are both facing $9 million deficits, say to their folks back home about what they are doing to reduce State revenues even further? In Ohio, Florida, New Jersey, and Michigan, in those States a billion-dollar deficit is going to be made worse by this bill.
Rick Allen: “I met with a number of people in the State of Maine, which I represent, the other day. They were concerned about all of…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the financial impact of a bill on state revenues during a debate.
Share
More from Rick Allen
It is your trust obligation. So you hear about this obligation. It is your trust corpus also, and language is a piece of that.
I thank my good friend from Florida, Mr. Bilirakis, for yielding. As vice chairman of the Communications and Technology Subcommittee, I rise today in support of the bipartisan FUTURE Networks Act, which I proudly introduced with my…
I thank the chairman for yielding the time. Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong support of the Protecting Women and Girls in Sports Act, a commonsense bill to ensure female athletes only compete with biological females. Unfortunately, in just 4…
Had I been present, I would have voted YEA on Roll Call No. 56 and AYE on Roll Call No. 57. PERSONAL EXPLANATION





