No, I didn't. I said that 70 percent of the families are in public schools. Then I said the distribution would be 50-50. The reason for that is parents who have children in the private schools are paying higher costs. They are paying, of course, the taxes for the public schools as well, and will probably have an incentive to save more. I think that is probably so. I sort of think that while 70 percent are in public schools, the distribution of 50-50 will probably be the case.
Paul Coverdell: “No, I didn't. I said that 70 percent of the families are in public schools. Then I said the distribution would be 50-50.…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the distribution of families between public and private schools.
Share
More from Paul Coverdell
Why should we do that? This is a classic example: Let's tell them what is important to them. You think it is important it only be for college. I think it ought to be up to the family to decide where and when they have a special need. Maybe…
the bipartisan education savings account which was passed in March and had been threatened by a veto from the President makes education more affordable for millions of Americans. I might say, during that debate of our proposal to empower…
I will show the Senator the data. We all see private schools that stand out. That is what forms the image. I am saying when you look at all the private schools across the country, you come up with a lot of people who do not have many…
I understand that it is the managers' intent that under the Caribbean Basin portion of the Act, an apparel article containing elastomeric yarns, including elestomeric filament yarns, shall be eligible for the de minimis rule set forth in…





