I do not think they are looking for courage to keep adding another burden, another tax burden, another regulatory burden on the backs of the working families. Most Americans--in fact, in survey data every social strata of our country--feel that the appropriate tax burden should be 25 percent. It does not matter whether you ask the very wealthy family or the poorest family. It is fascinating; they all come to the same number, that the burden of government, their willingness to contribute, is about 25 percent. Tomorrow is May 7. It is an important day in America, because May 7, believe it or not--I would never have believed I would be in the Senate talking about this kind of crisis, but May 7 is the first day for which an American family can earn money and resources for its own dreams.
Paul Coverdell: “I do not think they are looking for courage to keep adding another burden, another tax burden, another regulatory burden…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the repeal of the gas tax and its impact on American families.
Share
More from Paul Coverdell
Now, with respect to the provisions of the Africa and Caribbean Basin programs that deal with fabric or yarn not widely available in commercial quantities, am I correct that it is the intent of the managers that these provisions should be…
With respect to the so-called ``809'' benefits the Africa and CBI programs, is it the intent of managers that apparel articles remain eligible for duty-free and quota-free treatment when the fabric is cut both in the United States and the…
I understand that it is the managers' intent that under the Caribbean Basin portion of the Act, an apparel article containing elastomeric yarns, including elestomeric filament yarns, shall be eligible for the de minimis rule set forth in…
Sections 112 and 211 of the act will create new import programs for apparel produced in the Sub-Saharan and CBI countries which have been carefully crafted to bring significant benefits both to those regions and to the U.S. textile and…





