Your legislation, which I have been proud to coauthor, and I commend the work of the Senator from Missouri, leaves the decision about what families need and don't need to the families, the workers themselves. The alternatives proposed--and there are several. One is to turn the decision over to Secretary Shalala. I think that is a pretty big job to try to figure out what the millions of working families need and don't need. I think she might not be up to that. Or to try to construct Federal law that manages time off, which may or may not deal with the circumstances of a family, and, no, it would not be pay.
Paul Coverdell: “Your legislation, which I have been proud to coauthor, and I commend the work of the Senator from Missouri, leaves the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing family leave legislation and the decision-making power of families versus federal oversight.
Share
More from Paul Coverdell
Sections 112 and 211 of the act will create new import programs for apparel produced in the Sub-Saharan and CBI countries which have been carefully crafted to bring significant benefits both to those regions and to the U.S. textile and…
When the Act requires yarn to be ``wholly formed'' in the United States, am I correct that the intention of the managers is to require that all processes necessary to convert fibers into yarns-- i.e., spinning, extruding--be performed in…
I have one final question regarding the so-called 809 provisions of both the Africa and Caribbean Basin measures. Am I correct that it is the managers' intent that these provisions do not permit dying or finishing of the fabrics to be…
I thought I distinctly understood the Senator from Washington comment that it was represented in committee that portability was indeed a voucher.





