I have a comment on the statistics just demonstrated, because I was reading in the New York Times, and they begin the data in 1994. So it shows a slight increase. But the dramatic case that the Senator made is absolutely correct. You have to go back to 1992 and 1993 to see what really is happening with arrests and seizures of narcotics. I just point out that it is good that the Senator is making the point because our adversaries like to start measuring statistics in 1994. We can't do that.
Paul Coverdell: “I have a comment on the statistics just demonstrated, because I was reading in the New York Times, and they begin the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of accurate statistics on narcotics arrests and seizures.
Share
More from Paul Coverdell
When the Act requires yarn to be ``wholly formed'' in the United States, am I correct that the intention of the managers is to require that all processes necessary to convert fibers into yarns-- i.e., spinning, extruding--be performed in…
I rise specifically today about events that are under advisement this minute in Peru. As those who follow events there know, very aggressive behavior by President Fujimori led to a constitutional override of a two-term limitation on his…
I thought I distinctly understood the Senator from Washington comment that it was represented in committee that portability was indeed a voucher.
Now, with respect to the provisions of the Africa and Caribbean Basin programs that deal with fabric or yarn not widely available in commercial quantities, am I correct that it is the intent of the managers that these provisions should be…





