Would the Senator from Missouri think it reasonable that a person who is "unemployed" within the meaning of the manager's amendment would have to show some written proof from an unemployment office or other entity proving that he or she is unemployed and looking for a job? Or that a person who has been the "victim of fraud" would be required to show some written proof of the fraud? Like credit card records showing that someone used his or her credit cards?
Paul Coverdell: “Would the Senator from Missouri think it reasonable that a person who is "unemployed" within the meaning of the…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the requirements for proof of unemployment and fraud in a legislative amendment.
Share
More from Paul Coverdell
I rise specifically today about events that are under advisement this minute in Peru. As those who follow events there know, very aggressive behavior by President Fujimori led to a constitutional override of a two-term limitation on his…
I will be very brief. The Senator from Virginia and I have an honorable disagreement about how the Federal Government ought to respond to being a better partner in education. But the one issue that I would take some exception to and would…
Let me say that every year since the Republicans gained the majority we have worked to increase the maximum Pell grant. For more than 7 years, the Pell grant maximum fluctuated between $2,300 and $2,400. Last year, the President's budget…
America has a reading deficit! According to the National Adult Literacy Survey (NALS), 41 million adults are unable to perform even the simplest literacy tasks. The most recent National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) conducted…





