It is sort of ironic that this Monday afternoon we are beset with Presidential vetoes or threats to veto. He has indicated that he will veto the Family Friendly Workplace Act if it includes flextime, which is what I think most of us feel is among the more important features, to allow working families to adjust their time. The Senator from Wyoming has talked about compromise, but I just want to reiterate and try to get your impression. Don't you find it unusual that the only thing we have been met with here is a filibuster, and that if you are really interested in creating a family workplace work environment, wouldn't you think we would be getting suggested new language or something that might compromise, instead of sort of a straight-arm and voting down attempts to end the filibuster?
Paul Coverdell: “It is sort of ironic that this Monday afternoon we are beset with Presidential vetoes or threats to veto. He has…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing Presidential vetoes and the Family Friendly Workplace Act during Senate debate.
Share
More from Paul Coverdell
I think we are making headway on this. The implication that the education savings account is a vehicle for people who drive around in limousines is inaccurate. The Joint Tax Committee has found the education savings accounts would be used…
the bipartisan education savings account which was passed in March and had been threatened by a veto from the President makes education more affordable for millions of Americans. I might say, during that debate of our proposal to empower…
from rural Georgia to Capitol Hill, Americans recognize the immeasurable contribution that President and Mrs. Ronald Reagan have made to our Nation. Their support is most welcome.
Why should we do that? This is a classic example: Let's tell them what is important to them. You think it is important it only be for college. I think it ought to be up to the family to decide where and when they have a special need. Maybe…





