My question is this: Is it not true that if we were successful in passing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution requiring balanced budgets, there would be immense benefits for the present, that interest rates would drop, job lines would be shorter, there would be new businesses, and that the net effect would be that an average family in my State and yours would have the equivalent of making $3,000 to $5,000 of immediate new income in their checking accounts in the form of reduced home mortgages and loans, so that they could get about the business of getting America up, getting it housed and fed and ready to be the leaders of the future?
Paul Coverdell: “My question is this: Is it not true that if we were successful in passing a balanced budget amendment to the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the potential benefits of a balanced budget amendment during Senate debate.
Share
More from Paul Coverdell
When the Act requires yarn to be ``wholly formed'' in the United States, am I correct that the intention of the managers is to require that all processes necessary to convert fibers into yarns-- i.e., spinning, extruding--be performed in…
I rise specifically today about events that are under advisement this minute in Peru. As those who follow events there know, very aggressive behavior by President Fujimori led to a constitutional override of a two-term limitation on his…
Now, with respect to the provisions of the Africa and Caribbean Basin programs that deal with fabric or yarn not widely available in commercial quantities, am I correct that it is the intent of the managers that these provisions should be…
It is clear to me that Fort Stewart needs more military construction dollars. However, I also understand that the committee and the Pentagon have certain parameters within they work to determine military construction dollars. I understand…





