I think there are circumstances in which I would probably agree with you that things cross the line.

I think you just got to the root of the matter very efficiently and elegantly.

We are talking about... willfully, knowingly, and with extreme realism, falsely depicting you or any of us.

I think there are circumstances in which I would probably agree with you that things cross the line.

Indeed, as you point out, there is substantial jurisprudence that would support the regulation of speech in this extreme case, with knowing and willfully deceptive fabrication of statements made by candidates for office or public figures.

We are talking about, for example, Senator Fischer, one of your political adversaries, willfully, knowingly, and with extreme realism, falsely depicting you or any of us.

I think you just got to the root of the matter very efficiently and elegantly.

I think the conversation is a little bit overweight, risked to the point where we are in jeopardy of unduly restraining the diffusion of some productivity-enhancing or research-advancing capabilities.

I think the conversation is a little bit overweight, risked to the point where we are in jeopardy of unduly restraining the diffusion of some productivity-enhancing or research-advancing capabilities.

I think the conversation is a little bit overweight, risked to the point where we are in jeopardy of unduly restraining the diffusion of some productivity-enhancing or research-advancing capabilities.

If we're going to move forward with a legislative framework or a regulatory framework, we have to define clearly in legislative text precisely what it is that we are regulating.

If we're going to move forward with a legislative framework or a regulatory framework, we have to define clearly in legislative text precisely what it is that we are regulating.

If we're going to move forward with a legislative framework or a regulatory framework, we have to define clearly in legislative text precisely what it is that we are regulating.

last week, I voted to advance the Supreme Courts Ethics, Recusal, and Transparency Act out of the Judiciary Committee, as I believe that strong judicial ethics are critical to maintaining public trust in our judiciary. I rejected…

I think it's worth just stepping back and acknowledging the tremendous stress, anxiety that so many across the country are dealing with for so many reasons.

I think it's worth just stepping back and acknowledging the tremendous stress, anxiety that so many across the country are dealing with for so many reasons.

when we see vulnerable people targeted by powerful politicians for the purposes of dividing people and gaining power, with reckless disregard for the impact that it has on particular children and young people who are struggling.

when we see vulnerable people targeted by powerful politicians for the purposes of dividing people and gaining power, with reckless disregard for the impact that it has on particular children and young people who are struggling.

When we see vulnerable people targeted by powerful politicians for the purposes of dividing people and gaining power, with reckless disregard for the impact that it has on particular children and young people who are struggling...

I think it's worth just stepping back and acknowledging the tremendous stress, anxiety that so many across the country are dealing with for so many reasons.

Throughout history, transformative technologies have emerged with the potential to disrupt societies, economies, and politics profoundly.

doing that would practically guarantee that China becomes the world's leader in AI, giving it the opening that President Xi wants to impose the CCP's authoritarian values around the world.

AI capabilities are growing rapidly and in ways even its creators cannot predict.

I want to thank you, Ranking Member Blackburn, for working so hard and so closely with me.

The Subcommittee on Human Rights and the Law will come to order.