I appreciate his comment. That was my point. When I was listening to the Senator's speech, I got a little irritated. Then I realized I have probably done the same thing before too. I leaped over some facts that belong in the debate. The fact that the Congress directed Freddie and Fannie to own a percentage of their portfolio in subprime loans was the source of the capital that bought the first securities that created the subprime securities. I do not argue that there are not good things in this bill. In fact, when the Senator was referring to the liar loans, it was the Isakson-Landrieu amendment that we successfully added to this bill that defined that a qualified loan is to be exempt from risk potential because it requires income verification, requires an employer statement that the employee is hired, and it requires an income ratio that is sufficient to retire debt that is borrowed. I agree with the Senator. My point was that when all of us make these remarks of what bills are and they are not, we ought to include all of the facts that are in there, not just a select few. I appreciate the Senator's comments. I was proud to be a part of his amendment.
Share & report
More from Johnny Isakson
Mr. President, reserving the right to object and to take a couple minutes to give the Members the facts they need to make a decision tonight, I want to say a couple things. I am chairman of the Veterans' Affairs Committee. There are many…
USAID is without a doubt where America leaves its brightest spot and its mark all over the world.
If you have an attempted dialog with the Russian Federation in the context of a strong national defense establishment, where you have got tremendous $700 billion increase under way, and you are recapitalizing your nuclear arsenal, I think…
I told this--everybody that is here, all the Members that were here, the people in the audience here, the VSOs here--the issue of dealing with Blue Water Navy is no longer going to be a question.





