If we are doing climate change primarily in its focus on agriculture and its effect on agriculture, why would that not be a part of the Food for the Future appropriation rather than being titled 'climate change'?
Johnny Isakson: “If we are doing climate change primarily in its focus on agriculture and its effect on agriculture, why would that not…”
Editor's note · Context
Isakson questions the categorization of climate change funding versus agricultural programs.
Share
More from Johnny Isakson
I ask unanimous consent to speak for 60 seconds. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection? Without objection, it is so ordered.
I ask unanimous consent to address the Senate. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
it contains a list of literally hundreds of people who have helped me get to where I am today in this Chamber. A few of them are in this Chamber with me right now and a lot of them were here Tuesday of last week when the Senate was very…
4 years ago, about this time of the night on a Monday, I made a speech about Woody Woodside. Four years later, I make another speech about Woody Woodside. Four years ago, I acknowledged his 30 years of service to the people of Brunswick…





