What we have learned after 87 years of the current system is this: if we had sat down at the beginning of 1913 and asked ourselves how could we build a tax system that would punish people for earning and working hard, a system that would be obstructive of capital formation, we could not have done a better job. Our tax system is the largest impediment to people moving from the first rung of the economic ladder to the second, because the harder you work, the more you save, the more you invest, the more we take. It is a system that is inefficient.
JOHN LINDER: “What we have learned after 87 years of the current system is this: if we had sat down at the beginning of 1913 and asked…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the inefficiencies of the U.S. tax system during debate on the Date Certain Tax Code Replacement Act.
Share
More from JOHN LINDER
ATMs ran out of cash, so now we have no idea how those funds were spent, but I suspect many can guess. The Subcommittee on Welfare, on which I serve, recently had a hearing on this fund. One witness noted taxpayers already spend an…
My daughter at 35, she is now 37, called me and she said what in the world is AMT. She has got four little boys and the deductions and a fairly decent income gets them into the AMT. When it was set in 1969, it captured 90,000 taxpayers. In…
I simply cannot support the creation of a new entitlement that would send another $8.5 billion in unpaid-for Federal spending out the door.
I do share the Ranking Member's frustration that we are talking about it again, rather than doing something about it.





