I rise only to respond to the ranking member of the Committee on Appropriations's remarks about our obligation to provide services that have already been paid for. That is the point of this debate. For 26 years we have been providing services that have not been paid for. We have passed the bill on to future generations. That is why we are here and having trouble. But we insist on a balanced budget so we stop passing the bill on. That is why we are here.
JOHN LINDER: “I rise only to respond to the ranking member of the Committee on Appropriations's remarks about our obligation to…”
Editor's note · Context
Responding to remarks about funding obligations during a debate on budgetary issues.
Share
More from JOHN LINDER
ATMs ran out of cash, so now we have no idea how those funds were spent, but I suspect many can guess. The Subcommittee on Welfare, on which I serve, recently had a hearing on this fund. One witness noted taxpayers already spend an…
I respond to it that people do not put money under the mattress anymore. Wealthy people spend more than poor people. They will pay a higher share of the total cost of government; but to the extent that they do not spend that money, they…
I met Charlie Norwood over 30 years ago. We were both young dentists in Georgia. He was the president of the Georgia Dental Association, and I was a young, newly elected dentist in the Georgia legislature. And his enthusiasm blew me away…
I simply cannot support the creation of a new entitlement that would send another $8.5 billion in unpaid-for Federal spending out the door.





