The gentleman was on the floor when this happened and knows that we tried to explain at the time that the amendment to the rule was effectively a striking amendment that said that, if the rule passes as amended, in no way will any expansion of vision or dental benefits occur. The gentleman made it very clear he would not mind debating that on the floor of the House and having an open discussion of it and maybe passing an expansion of vision and dental benefits, but to pass this rule as amended would allow us not to sneak it in. So to pass this rule as amended is a striking amendment to prohibit any expansion of benefits without a vote by the House.
JOHN LINDER: “The gentleman was on the floor when this happened and knows that we tried to explain at the time that the amendment to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of an amendment related to vision and dental benefits during House debate.
Share
More from JOHN LINDER
ATMs ran out of cash, so now we have no idea how those funds were spent, but I suspect many can guess. The Subcommittee on Welfare, on which I serve, recently had a hearing on this fund. One witness noted taxpayers already spend an…
Wealthy people pay taxes on personal consumption, and wealth has no meaning unless it is spent on personal consumption. If I had $100 million and lived in a $20,000 home and drove a used car, that $100 million would mean nothing to me. So…
You told it to me once. It is the difference between someone who is a big believer and a fanatic.
If you really want to help working families move up that ladder, you have to deal with the payroll Tax Code.





