Mr. Speaker, I am just rising out of confusion as to whether the gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. Moakley) states that raising IRA limits to $5,000 is a tax cut for the rich. Does increasing contribution limits for 401(k) plans for regular workers, is that a tax cut for the rich? How about increasing the portability of retirement plans so people can move from one job to another? Is that just for the rich? If we simplify the pension system to encourage small businesses to offer their employees pension plans, is that another tax cut for the rich? We have got some small business tax relief in here to allow them to expense certain kinds of costs. Is this tax cuts for the rich? Or has the gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. Moakley) just pulled out on old speech and rerun it one more time?
JOHN LINDER: “Mr. Speaker, I am just rising out of confusion as to whether the gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. Moakley) states that…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing claims about tax cuts and retirement plan benefits during a debate.
Share
More from JOHN LINDER
I feel rude trying to inject some fact into this kabuki theater, but I am going to try: 85 percent of America is insured; 95 percent of those people are happy with their insurance. The other 15 percent uninsured, they consume 70 percent on…
I simply cannot support the creation of a new entitlement that would send another $8.5 billion in unpaid-for Federal spending out the door.
That is right. So the consumer of that small business not only pays the $100 plus the payroll tax, it also pays the $724.
Let us remind them that no business inputs are taxed. No tractor will be taxed. No barn will be taxed. Anything used in the business is tax free. No seeds will be taxed. I tell the farmers if you buy a tractor to work your land, there is…





