Mr. Speaker, I am just rising out of confusion as to whether the gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. Moakley) states that raising IRA limits to $5,000 is a tax cut for the rich. Does increasing contribution limits for 401(k) plans for regular workers, is that a tax cut for the rich? How about increasing the portability of retirement plans so people can move from one job to another? Is that just for the rich? If we simplify the pension system to encourage small businesses to offer their employees pension plans, is that another tax cut for the rich? We have got some small business tax relief in here to allow them to expense certain kinds of costs. Is this tax cuts for the rich? Or has the gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. Moakley) just pulled out on old speech and rerun it one more time?
JOHN LINDER: “Mr. Speaker, I am just rising out of confusion as to whether the gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. Moakley) states that…”
On the recordOctober 26, 2000
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Addressing claims about tax cuts and retirement plan benefits during a debate.
Share
More from JOHN LINDER
Mar 21, 2016
I do share the Ranking Member's frustration that we are talking about it again, rather than doing something about it.
May 20, 2010
ATMs ran out of cash, so now we have no idea how those funds were spent, but I suspect many can guess. The Subcommittee on Welfare, on which I serve, recently had a hearing on this fund. One witness noted taxpayers already spend an…
Jun 8, 2009
I simply cannot support the creation of a new entitlement that would send another $8.5 billion in unpaid-for Federal spending out the door.
Sep 23, 2004
That is right. So the consumer of that small business not only pays the $100 plus the payroll tax, it also pays the $724.





