My understanding is, and the gentleman from Georgia could tell better than me, we spend about $34 billion a year on the earned income tax credit. The reason it was put into place many years ago was to relieve people at lower income, $17,000 to $23,000 or $24,000 a year from the payroll tax. These people do not pay income taxes, so they are not paying for the military or the parks or the Justice Department or the FBI, and the earned income tax credit relieves them of paying for their own retirement. Nine billion dollars of that $34 billion is considered to be fraud. Under our system, since nobody will have a payroll tax, there will be no reason to have an earned income tax, an earned income tax credit, and we will save a ton of money.
JOHN LINDER: “My understanding is, and the gentleman from Georgia could tell better than me, we spend about $34 billion a year on the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the earned income tax credit and its implications during a floor speech.
Share
More from JOHN LINDER
Wealthy people pay taxes on personal consumption, and wealth has no meaning unless it is spent on personal consumption. If I had $100 million and lived in a $20,000 home and drove a used car, that $100 million would mean nothing to me. So…
As a matter of fact, I was in the Chair and I was accused of shutting down the vote while people were in the well seeking to vote. And the next day the C-SPAN tapes proved you were wrong and I was right. The people coming in to vote were…
I do share the Ranking Member's frustration that we are talking about it again, rather than doing something about it.
If you really want to help working families move up that ladder, you have to deal with the payroll Tax Code.





