I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes legislation in an appropriation bill and therefore violates clause 2 of rule XXI. The rule states in pertinent part: an amendment to a general appropriation bill shall not be in order if changing existing law. This amendment constitutes a transfer not permitted under rule XXI. I ask for a ruling from the Chair. The Acting CHAIR. Does any Member wish to be heard on the point of order?
John Rice Carter: “I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes legislation in…”
Share
More from John Rice Carter
I rise today to recognize St. Simons Island's designation by U.S. News and World Report as one of the best underrated travel destinations in the U.S. They evaluated over 1,500 vacation destinations worldwide and ranked them across numerous…
I rise today to thank Brian Patterson who was recently honored with the Carnegie Medal of Heroism for his courageous acts in a 2022 car crash. Brian is a retired soldier and LifeStar mechanic. On July 8, 2022, while driving down the…
By direction of the Republican Conference, I offer a privileged resolution and ask for its immediate consideration. The Clerk read the resolution, as follows: H. Res. 283 Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is hereby, elected…
The incumbents, Democrats and Republicans, look upon this unlimited money as a great benefit to themselves.





