On the recordJune 2, 2011
I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes legislation in an appropriation bill and therefore violates clause 2 of rule XXI. The rule states, in pertinent part: An amendment to a general appropriations bill shall not be in order if changing existing law and it requires a new determination. I ask for a ruling from the Chair. The CHAIR. Does any Member seek to speak on the point of order? If not, the Chair is prepared to rule. The Chair finds that this amendment includes language requiring a new determination of whether a corporation discloses certain contributions. The amendment, therefore, constitutes legislation in violation of clause 2 of rule XXI. The point of order is sustained and the amendment is not in order.
