This amendment establishes additional criteria for the commission's one-sided review of all Federal regulations, authorizing it to identify rules for repeal that may limit or prohibit agencies from adopting technology to improve efficiency and effectiveness in order to lower regulatory costs. Although this criteria, itself, may be unobjectionable on its face, it does nothing to change the commission's cost-only, deregulatory, and dangerous mandate under title I of H.R. 1155. Furthermore, rather than allowing agencies to modify or improve existing rules to accommodate for technological changes, this amendment would only create a basis for eliminating rules. For instance, this amendment would authorize the commission to identify for elimination a rule protecting workers against discrimination, regardless of the rule's benefits, if the costs associated with the rule could be mitigated by adopting new technologies to improve efficiency. In other words, no matter how important and beneficial a rule prohibiting discrimination may be, it could be eliminated if the commission determines that it somehow encumbers agency efficiency. That is laughable.…
On the recordJanuary 6, 2016
Source
govinfo.govShare
More from Hank Johnson
Dec 12, 2024
I thank the ranking member for yielding me the time. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in opposition to S. 4199. You don't get to pick the horse after that horse has already won the race, but that is exactly what my Republican colleagues are…
Dec 3, 2024
I yield myself such time as I may consume. Madam Speaker, I rise in strong support of H.R. 8666, which would amend title 28 of the United States Code to authorize holding court in the Central Division of Utah in Moab and Monticello. Adding…
Apr 29, 2025
I thank the gentlewoman for those very thoughtful comments. The terror that inflicts my colleagues on the other side of the aisle so that they find it impossible to muster the courage to speak out when they see something wrong and hear…





