In 1997, we spent $325.7 million, and if our amendment passes, in 1998 we will spend $325.7 million. I would just like to point out that is not a cut of anything, that is just not giving them a raise.
Charles Norwood: “In 1997, we spent $325.7 million, and if our amendment passes, in 1998 we will spend $325.7 million. I would just like…”
Editor's note · Context
Responding to a colleague about budget allocations during a debate.
Share
More from Charles Norwood
I simply ask the gentleman to reconsider our unanimous consent to remove two words that would, I think, make an amendment that is going to pass better in your mind.
I point out to all Members the reason you must pass this amendment is it is against the law to have a sanctuary city, a sanctuary State. This amendment goes to the heart of the frustrations of the police and deputies. They apprehend the…
It doesn't promote anybody's best interests to be so unreasonable that you put these people -- these miners out of work. That's not good for them.
Though I was absent on Tuesday, November 8, 2005 for medical reasons, I wish to have my intended votes recorded in the Congressional Record for the following votes: Rollcall vote 573 on the Motion to Table the Appeal of the Ruling of the…





