let me point out to my friend from Wisconsin [Mr. Obey] that I am absolutely sure the gentleman does not know why I am doing this. I know the gentleman just told the Members why I am doing this, but I am confident that the gentleman does not know. Second, let me point out that, yes, I voted against special education, but that was before the Republican Congress came in and helped straighten that bill out. At the time, a considerable amount of that money was going to the attorneys, and until we could stop that particular bleeding problem, then it did not make sense to put taxpayer dollars in it.
Charles Norwood: “let me point out to my friend from Wisconsin [Mr. Obey] that I am absolutely sure the gentleman does not know why I am…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing his previous vote against special education funding and subsequent changes made by the Republican Congress.
Share
More from Charles Norwood
I yield myself 2 minutes. In response to the last speaker, number one, had the gentlewoman been here earlier, the gentlewoman would have heard about why this is not an unfunded mandate. Number two, if the gentlewoman believes local law…
I simply ask the gentleman to reconsider our unanimous consent to remove two words that would, I think, make an amendment that is going to pass better in your mind.
this rule, which I support, will allow one of the most critical actions to date in the war on terror. Hardly a charade. This action is not military in nature. It is entirely political. But it will determine victory or defeat as surely as…
in conclusion, I will simply say to my friend, the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Scott) that this is not an amendment that justifies or does not justify the previous amendment. This is an effort to get the facts on what we already know. If…





