This amendment is drastic. It is costly. It is inefficient. It affects all families and individuals currently using a voucher or living in section 8 project-based housing. It's impossible to administer. Even HUD and the administration itself has not even requested it. It imposes a new unfunded mandate on private sector landlords owning Federally assisted housing, forcing them to assume the role of a welfare agency. The gentleman talks about a boom on the taxpayers. This imposes a significant cost to taxpayers by raising the costs incurred by public housing. And I have in my hands a letter from just about every housing and real estate and housing association in this country saying, in effect, that we are not able to support the Hensarling amendment. Most exemplary of the ridiculousness of this amendment is that he asks for 20 hours of work, but doesn't say how, doesn't say when. Twenty hours when? Twenty hours a week? Twenty hours a month? Twenty hours a year? There is no way to administer it. But Madam Chair, what is so hurtful to me about this amendment; yes, it is mean-spirited. But not only is it mean-spirited, my friend, it is, indeed, bigoted.
Austin Scott: “This amendment is drastic. It is costly. It is inefficient. It affects all families and individuals currently using a…”
On the recordJuly 12, 2007
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to housing assistance during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Austin Scott
Apr 28, 2025
When the Dems expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act, they made that percentage match 90-10%. So the federal government is paying 90% of the Medicaid expansion.
Jul 9, 2024
These liberal activists I personally believe are funded by the Chinese Communist Government...
Jul 9, 2025
Establishing the mounds as a National Park will ensure that they are protected and preserved for years to come, allowing generations of Americans and Georgians to enjoy our state's rich history and cultures.
Dec 5, 2023
I have continuously heard from my farmers that it is crucial we increase reference prices for Title I commodities in the next farm bill.





