The point being is, that we do not have a site-selection process here that has any rationale. And I guess the last question I would ask, because the Nevada test site has been an area that has been used, as the Senator correctly points out, for testing, is the Senator aware that the equivalency of 85,000 metric tons of nuclear waste which would be stored would require 2.3 million atomic tests the size of the test at Alamogordo during World War II--2.3 million tests?
William Bryan: “The point being is, that we do not have a site-selection process here that has any rationale. And I guess the last…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the rationale behind the site-selection process for nuclear waste storage.
Share
More from William Bryan
Burn down your cities and leave our farms, and your cities will spring up again as if by magic, but destroy our farms and the grass will grow in the streets of every city in the country.
Do I understand the thrust of the Senator's argument is not to advocate some new standards for CAFE but simply to permit those who are charged with that responsibility to make a basic inquiry as to whether or not there is room, based upon…
How does closing the only lab entirely focused on preparing and protecting first responders against threats of terrorism make any sense?
If I may respond to the excessively generous comments of my chairman, my colleague, and my friend, the reality is that working with him has been a pleasure. Without his cooperation and, obviously, trying to work in a bipartisan way to…





