Do I understand the thrust of the Senator's argument is not to advocate some new standards for CAFE but simply to permit those who are charged with that responsibility to make a basic inquiry as to whether or not there is room, based upon science, safety, and other considerations, to consider an increase in fuel economy standards?
William Bryan: “Do I understand the thrust of the Senator's argument is not to advocate some new standards for CAFE but simply to permit…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing fuel economy standards during a Senate debate.
Share
More from William Bryan
in what has become one of the more unpleasant annual rituals here in the Senate, the majority leader has once again put the Senate on notice that we may soon consider legislation related to the disposal of high-level nuclear waste at the…
That is, as the Senator from California knows, an argument that has been raised. It is a specious argument. The Senator from California hails from a jurisdiction which has been on the cutting edge of so much of the technology of the…
Again, let me urge the NBA and the Philadelphia 76ers to step forward and be heard. They will say: Look, we cannot control Mr. Iverson's conduct. That may be true. But they have an obligation, a responsibility to speak out and to condemn…
finally, let me conclude by saying that the administration has indicated the President may veto this legislation because of the heavy tilt toward managed care plans, the lack of accountability, and the lack of provisions that would…





