I want to return to the starting point for just a moment to talk about this being unnecessary legislation--unnecessary in that the policy and the scientific community disagree with its very premise. Now, when you look at the various groups that are playing a role in this debate, one thing stands out: The only people that are advocating this legislation are the nuclear utilities and their supporters. It is not the environmental community. My colleague recited that every major organization in America that has an environmental constituency has opposed this legislation, and for good reason. It is not the scientific community.
William Bryan: “I want to return to the starting point for just a moment to talk about this being unnecessary legislation--unnecessary…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing opposition to legislation related to nuclear utilities and environmental concerns.
Share
More from William Bryan
I wish to respond to the gracious statement by the chairman of the Energy Committee. Although we have had strong differences on this issue, the differences have been professional, not personal. He has been very professional in the way in…
the quality of education in this country is of enormous concern to the American people, and is a defining issue in Congress this year. I believe that few priorities are more important than the future of our Nation's youth. When Americans…
there are no maps. That will give you some indication of what a shoddy, moving target this has been as we have tried to debate and expand on it. It is simply indefensible public policy. I urge my colleagues to vote against it.
if I may respond to the excessively generous comments of my chairman, my colleague, and my friend, the reality is that working with him has been a pleasure. Without his cooperation and, obviously, trying to work in a bipartisan way to…





