That is the provision that had not heretofore been discussed, as the majority leader knows, and we had assumed within the parameters of what was being discussed all rights would be reserved under rule XXII, including any options that might be available to us in the event that this legislation moved to conference. So it was on that basis that we interposed our objection.
William Bryan: “That is the provision that had not heretofore been discussed, as the majority leader knows, and we had assumed within…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing legislative provisions and objections during a floor debate.
Share
More from William Bryan
If the Senator follows that line of reasoning, would he not agree the same managers will tell you that $220 million is adequate for the timber harvest program, would the Senator agree with that?
Burn down your cities and leave our farms, and your cities will spring up again as if by magic, but destroy our farms and the grass will grow in the streets of every city in the country.
Do I understand the thrust of the Senator's argument is not to advocate some new standards for CAFE but simply to permit those who are charged with that responsibility to make a basic inquiry as to whether or not there is room, based upon…
How does closing the only lab entirely focused on preparing and protecting first responders against threats of terrorism make any sense?





