I would say to my friend, Mr. King, yesterday in the bill there was a discriminatory provision that favored or discriminated for or against some territories or States as opposed to others in the minimum wage bill. Is there anything that the gentleman is aware of in this bill that would discriminate in terms of Federal funding for human cloning, helping some territories and treating some States and territories different from one another as, unbeknownst to the Members, occurred yesterday in the minimum wage bill?
Tom Feeney: “I would say to my friend, Mr. King, yesterday in the bill there was a discriminatory provision that favored or…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing potential discrimination in federal funding related to human cloning in a bill.
Share
More from Tom Feeney
When Sarbanes-Oxley was passed, America had roughly 48 percent of the world capital market formation. We're down to about 39 percent. Mr. Chairman, I ask you, because you're a good friend and you're smart about this stuff, at what point…
Was section 404 ever debated in the Financial Services Committee that you now chair?
I will tell you this, before Sarbanes-Oxley, foreign initial public offerings raised 90 cents of every new dollar in America. Now 90 cents of new dollar raised by international public offerings is raised overseas. We are outsourcing…
This really is an amendment that we're enthusiastic about. NASA currently conducts weather research in cooperation with NOAA, although through the U.S. Weather Research Program, the gentleman's amendment emphasizes the importance of this…





