I want to know what parallels there are between North Korea and where we are with Iran right now in the nuclear so we don't make the same mistakes.

I think it would behoove the American Government, the American people, and improve our national security if we drew some lines and said, if you cross this line, this is considered an act of war.

At what point were there triggers or signs that we knew they weren't staying true to their mission to get away from nuclear proliferation?

You feel it is best to fight them over there then here, and I agree.

In order to complete a battle and have support behind you, you have to have a clear, defined mission.

ISIS' vision is an apocalyptic vision to destroy America. They want a worldwide caliphate, and in doing that, you know, they are looking to come here.

I appreciate the work that you have done on this, and I appreciate the attention that this has brought. Mr. Speaker, there is a lot of consternation about this bill. I stand here today, obviously, in support of my bill, H.R. 5759, the…

I agree with you in that their two pillars are the rejection of U.S. influence and the rejection of Israel's existence.

The more flawed the deal, the more important it will be for Congress to defend the sanctions architecture to maintain economic leverage.

Congress should continue pushing on all of these fronts, but it should also defend the very sanctions architecture that was so instrumental in creating.

A negotiated agreement is the preferred solution to peacefully resolve this nuclear crisis.

I don't see anything that we got to even open up these negotiations.