Underlying the entire national health care reform debate lie two central philosophical questions: How much Government do we want in the American system? How much Government can we afford? Some people believe the Government should take over and manage our entire national health care delivery system--with centralized control and decisionmaking. On the other end of the spectrum are those of us who believe that our health care decisionmaking must remain predominantly private, personal, and market driven. Clearly, the current patchwork of Government and market forces that crisscross our health structure have left an imperfect situation in which millions of Americans lack access to quality care and the cost of providing that quality care is skyrocketing. But is more Government control--some of us might say 'interference'--the answer? Looking at the history of American health care spending, we see alarming trends that raise serious red flags about the costs of Government-run health care.
Porter Goss: “Underlying the entire national health care reform debate lie two central philosophical questions: How much Government do…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the philosophical questions surrounding national health care reform.
Share
More from Porter Goss
we in Florida are deeply troubled by the OCS inventory language currently under consideration in the energy bill conference. This language was already firmly rejected once by this body, and I believe we should make it well known that we…
Mr. Speaker, we have always known that the war on terrorism was going to be lengthy and difficult. President Bush told us that from the very beginning. Americans everywhere have girded up for a sustained conflict across the globe, around…
Mr. Speaker, I think this debate is about the rule, and that is what we are going to be talking about in order to have more chances to articulate the sentiments as were just expressed so articulately by the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr…
Mr. Speaker, our President, having exhausted all other options, made the decision to take action against Saddam Hussein and the threat posed by his evil tyranny. During that course, the debate about that, this House was presented with an…





