we in Florida are deeply troubled by the OCS inventory language currently under consideration in the energy bill conference. This language was already firmly rejected once by this body, and I believe we should make it well known that we will reject it again if it returns to this Chamber. The prospect of an ``inventory'' of OCS resources, specifically in the Gulf of Mexico, poses a direct and detrimental threat to our coastal areas in Florida. It looks like a badly disguised attempt to re-open our coastal waters to drilling. In fact, it is the latest move in a long series of clever distractions that try to mask what it really is: a relentless effort to undermine the long-standing OCS moratorium and expose our coastal communities to the dangerous and disastrous repercussions that oil drilling can often bring. This is an insult to the Members of Congress who voted the inventory language out of the House version, as well as to our constituents in Florida. In our State, we have a particularly strong interest in protecting our shores and beaches from unnecessary threat. We are blessed with beautiful beaches and coastal areas that provide extraordinary benefits to Floridians and millions of other Americans who visit. Over 80 percent of our State's population lives in coastal communities. These beaches and coastal areas are an indispensable part of the great character and quality of life we have in Florida.
Porter Goss: “we in Florida are deeply troubled by the OCS inventory language currently under consideration in the energy bill…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about the OCS inventory language in the energy bill during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Porter Goss
certainly we will publicly not commit to that. We will publicly commit to where the review of the information takes us. We have a bipartisan agreement on that. We have 20 able members who are members of good judgment and good sense who…
I too would like to congratulate my ranking member and the members of the staff on both sides of the aisle. Normally I would name all those staff. This year I am just going to point to one individual who really was the architect of the…
There are two reasons why this would be a difficult task to do publicly, and I would not make that broad a commitment. The first is that much of the material that the gentleman is talking about is probably classified if the gentleman is…
Mr. Speaker, I think this debate is about the rule, and that is what we are going to be talking about in order to have more chances to articulate the sentiments as were just expressed so articulately by the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr…





